Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michal Przysiezny vs Miloslav Mecir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Przysiezny vs Mecir analysis and find out who is favored!
Michal Przysiezny vs Miloslav Mecir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Przysiezny 1 - 2 Mecir
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Przysiezny has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mecir has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Przysiezny, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mecir has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Przysiezny has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mecir has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Przysiezny has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mecir winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93). Mecir has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 39/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 52/ 43).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Przysiezny winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Przysiezny winning 4 and Mecir winning 5. The last match between Przysiezny and Mecir was at the Kazan Challenger, 18-03-2015, Second, I.hard with Michal Przysiezny getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Przysiezny and Mecir have played a deciding set 3 times, with Przysiezny winning 1 times and Mecir 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Przysiezny winning 1, and Mecir 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Przysiezny has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mecir has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Przysiezny has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mecir has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Przysiezny has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mecir has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Przysiezny 1 - 2 Mecir
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
4
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
56% (465-368)
Career Total W/L
63% (535-308)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$403,630
Career Prize Money
$64,849
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Przysiezny VS Mecir H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Michal Przysiezny | Miloslav Mecir |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 5 |
| Games Won | 46 | 47 |
| Aces (Total) | 38 | 27 |
| DFs (Total) | 19 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:43 | 1:51:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (179/297) | 63% (172/275) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (135/179) | 75% (129/172) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (64/118) | 59% (61/103) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 31% (5/16) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (85/275) | 33% (98/297) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
Przysiezny VS Mecir H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Miloslav Mecir
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
15
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
0
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
29 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
31 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Miloslav Mecir
Player
Michal Przysiezny
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
10
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Miloslav Mecir
Player
Michal Przysiezny
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
16
5
Double Faults
11
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michal Przysiezny | Miloslav Mecir |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Miloslav Mecir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miloslav Mecir
Player
Andriej Kapas
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
28 of
33)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
12 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Miloslav Mecir
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
14
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Miloslav Mecir
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miloslav Mecir
Player
Pascal Brunner
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Miloslav Mecir
Player
Costin Paval
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Miloslav Mecir
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
Player
Miloslav Mecir
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Miloslav Mecir
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonio Veic
Player
Miloslav Mecir
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Miloslav Mecir
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
15
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
0
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
29 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
31 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Przysiezny Vs Mecir Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
